Atlanta Divorce Attorney Blog

Child Support and Health Insurance for Children

2010-03-10T01:33:33Z

Under the Georgia Child Support Guidelines, expenses for a child’s health insurance premiums are included in the child support calculation. OCGA §19-6-15(h). The total health insurance premium is prorated between the parents based upon their respective incomes on the child support worksheets. The health insurance premium gets added as an adjustment to the basic child support obligation as an “additional expense” on the Child Support Worksheets. OCGA 19-6-15(h)(2)(A). The total premium is then divided pro rata between the parents and the end result is that the payor gets credit toward his/her child support obligation for the amount paid. Thus, the child support obligation is lowered by the amount of the premium for which the other parent is responsible.

For example, if the father makes $40,000 per year and the mother makes $60,000 per year, and the health insurance premium is $100/month, the father will be responsible for $40 and the mother will be responsible for $60. If the father is the child support payor and he is the one paying the premiums, his child support obligation will be lowered by $60/month, which is the amount of the health insurance premium for which the mother is responsible.

Standard Visitation

2010-03-03T01:32:06Z

If you are going through a divorce and you and your spouse have children together, an inevitable question will be: how often will I see my children? It is most common for one parent to have primary physical custody with the other parent having secondary physical custody and visitation. In discussing the custody and visitation arrangement with your spouse or divorce attorney, you will likely hear the term “standard visitation.”

“Standard visitation” is generally every other weekend with one overnight during the week in which the non-custodial parent does not have weekend visitation. Standard visitation includes an equal split of all holidays. Each parent generally has half of the holidays each year with the holidays rotating every other year. For example, one parent will have Thanksgiving with the children in even numbered years and the other parent will have Thanksgiving with the children in odd numbered years. In addition, with standard visitation, each parent generally has blocks of extended time (2-3 weeks) during the summer for vacations with the children.

Our divorce law firm likes to use “standard visitation” as a starting point for custody and visitation discussions as the “standard visitation” outlined above does not work for all families. Some families want different holidays addressed while work commitments may keep some parents from having overnights with the children during the week. Whatever your family’s situation, it is important to find a visitation schedule that works well for both parents as well as the children.

Where to file divorce when parties live in different states

2010-02-23T19:39:08Z

It is often confusing for spouses who live in different states to figure out the appropriate state in which to bring their divorce and child custody action. Jurisdiction in a child custody case in which the parents reside in different states is governed by the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (“UCCJEA”). The Georgia appellate courts often hear cases regarding this issue and the Court of Appeals of Georgia recently affirmed a trial court’s ruling that jurisdiction was proper in Georgia. In Cohen v. Cohen, the parties were married and had a child in Georgia, but the wife subsequently moved to West Virginia. Cohen v. Cohen, 300 Ga. App. 7 (2009). About a year after moving to West Virginia, the wife filed for divorce and custody there, and the husband filed in Georgia a month later. Id. The West Virginia trial court granted the husband’s motion to dismiss that action and the wife then filed a motion to dismiss the Georgia action for lack of jurisdiction. Id. Generally, “[A] court of this state has jurisdiction to make an initial child custody determination only if:

(1) This state is the home state of the child on the date of the commencement of the proceeding, or was the home state of the child within six months before the commencement of the proceeding and the child is absent from this state but a parent or person acting as a parent continues to live in this state;
(2) A court of another state does not have jurisdiction under paragraph (1) of this subsection, or a court of the home state of the child has declined to exercise jurisdiction on the ground that this state is the more appropriate forum under Code Section 19-9-67 or 19-9-68 and:
(A) The child and the child's parents, or the child and at least one parent or a person acting as a parent, have a significant connection with this state other than mere physical presence; and
(B) Substantial evidence is available in this state concerning the child's care, protection, training, and personal relationships;
(3) All courts having jurisdiction under paragraph (1) or (2) of this subsection have declined to exercise jurisdiction on the ground that a court of this state is the more appropriate forum to determine the custody of the child under Code Section 19-9-67 or 19-9-68; or
(4) No court of any other state would have jurisdiction under the criteria specified in paragraph (1), (2), or (3) of this subsection.” O.C.G.A. §19-9-61(a).

The Court of Appeals affirmed Georgia’s jurisdiction under subsection OCGA 19-9-61(a)(3), stating that “[t]he trial court made specific reference to the West Virginia court's order, which explicitly found that Heather still had a Georgia driver's license, was a registered voter in Georgia, had utility bills in her name coming to her Georgia address, and had student loan and credit card bills in her name coming to her Georgia address.” Cohen at 9. Those facts, combined with the fact that the dismissal in West Virginia was not appealed, made jurisdiction proper in Georgia.

Fulton County jurisdiction ruling vacated in custody case

2010-02-16T19:32:17Z

A decision of a Fulton County judge regarding jurisdiction in a custody modification case was recently overturned in Murillo v. Murillo, 360 Ga. App. 61 (2009). A husband and wife were divorced in Fulton County in 1997 and the wife was granted custody of the parties’ child. Id. at 62. In 2002, the wife moved with the child to North Carolina. In 2008, pursuant to the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (“UCCJEA”), the husband filed a Petition to Modify Custody in Fulton County Superior Court. Id. The trial court then granted the wife’s motion asking the court to decline jurisdiction as North Carolina was the more convenient forum for the proceeding. Id.

Generally, since Fulton County was the court that entered the original custody ruling, Fulton County had “exclusive, continuing jurisdiction” over the modification action unless the court determines that it determines that it is an inconvenient forum under the circumstances and that a court of another state is a more appropriate forum. OCGA §19-9-67. To make that determination, OCGA §19-9-67(b) requires the court to consider all of the following factors:

(1) Whether family violence has occurred and is likely to continue in the future and which state could best protect the parties and the child;
(2) The length of time the child has resided outside this state;
(3) The distance between the court in this state and the court in the state that would assume jurisdiction;
(4) The relative financial circumstances of the parties;
(5) Any agreement of the parties as to which state should assume jurisdiction;
(6) The nature and location of the evidence required to resolve the pending litigation, including testimony of the child;
(7) The ability of the court of each state to decide the issue expeditiously and the procedures necessary to present the evidence; and
(8) The familiarity of the court of each state with the facts and issues in the pending litigation.

In vacating the decision of the Fulton County court, the Court of Appeals did not say that the end result was incorrect per se, but rather emphasized that the court did not consider and reference ALL of the required factors in its written Order in making its decision that it was no longer a convenient forum. Id. at 64. Thus, the Court of Appeals directed the trial courts to always consider ALL of the factors in making a jurisdiction decision.

Order incarcerating wife for contempt reversed

2010-02-09T21:18:41Z

The Court of Appeals recently emphasized the due process required before incarcerating a person for contempt of a divorce decree. In Bauman v. Humphries, according to the parties’ divorce decree, the wife was required to enroll the minor children in private school and pay all associated expenses. Bauman v. Humphries, 300 Ga. App. 263 (2009). Following a hearing, the trial court found the wife in willful contempt of this provision of the divorce decree, but gave her the opportunity to purge herself of the contempt by enrolling the children at the specified school by a specified date. Id. If the wife failed to purge herself, she was to be incarcerated until she complied. Id. at 264. Shortly thereafter, the husband’s attorney sent a letter to the court alleging that the wife failed to comply by the specified date and included a proposed order for incarceration, which the trial court signed. Id.

Upon appeal by the wife, the Court of Appeals reversed, relying on well-settled Supreme Court of Georgia rulings and stating that "in Georgia, a trial court cannot order incarceration pursuant to a self-effectuating order, regarding future acts, without benefit of a hearing." (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Smith v. Smith, 280 Ga. 620, 621 (632 SE2d 83) (2006). The Court went on to state that even when a hearing has been held adjudging a person in contempt, the trial court cannot sign an order of incarceration based upon a letter from an interested individual. Bauman at 264. The Court of Appeals quoted the Supreme Court of Georgia, which held that “the court may only act, at a minimum, on an ‘affidavit . . . from a neutral and disinterested court official or other officer based upon objective information.’” Hall v. Doyle-Hall, 284 Ga. 325, 326 (667 SE2d 81) (2008).

Alimony award overturned due to husband’s inability to pay

2010-02-02T20:30:43Z

The Georgia Supreme Court recently affirmed the Court of Appeals’ reversal of an alimony award as contrary to the evidence presented at trial. Coker v. Coker, 286 Ga. 20 (2009). The parties were married for approximately 24 years and had no children together. The only marital asset was a house. In addition, the husband had a separate asset, an interest in an LLC, which was worth approximately $100,000, but could not be converted to cash. Id. at 20, 21. The wife’s income was $45,000 and the husband’s income at the time of trial was $500/week, though the trial court determined his annual income to be $30,000. Id. Despite the husband’s meager income and assets, the trial court awarded the wife lump sum alimony in the amount of $36,500, which was to be paid within 3 months of the final decree of divorce. Id.

Generally, alimony is to be awarded based upon the needs of the party to whom it is awarded and the ability of the other party to pay. OCGA § 19-6-1 (c). In determining whether alimony should be awarded, and the amount thereof, the court looks at many factors, including the separate assets of each party and their earning capacities. OCGA § 19-6-1 (a). The Supreme Court acknowledged that the wife’s anticipated expenses justified her need for alimony, but stated that “the record is completely devoid of any evidence of Husband's ability to pay the trial court's lump sum alimony award.” Id. at 22. Without that evidence, the award must be reversed.

Jury demand stricken in Gwinnett county divorce

2010-01-26T20:26:52Z

Recently, the Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed a Gwinnett Superior Court’s granting of a wife’s motion to strike the husband’s demand for a jury trial in the parties’ divorce action. In a divorce case, either party can demand a jury trial. Generally, “when a party makes a timely demand for a jury trial, the trial court cannot proceed without a jury unless the parties consent to a bench trial by a written stipulation filed with the court or an oral stipulation made in open court and entered in the record.” OCGA § 9-11-39 (a). One exception to this general rule is that “a party in a divorce case can, by [his] voluntary actions, impliedly waive a demand for a jury trial.” Matthews v. Matthews, 268 Ga. 863, 864 (2) (494 SE2d 325) (1998).

In Kauttner v. Kauttner, the wife filed for divorce and the husband requested a jury trial. Kautter v. Kautter, 286 Ga. 16 (2009). When the case was called for trial, the husband deliberately chose not to attend and instructed his attorney not to participate in the proceedings. As a result, the wife filed a motion to strike the jury demand. The Gwinnett Superior Court granted the wife’s motion and conducted a bench trial, and the husband appealed.

The Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed the granting of the motion to strike the husband’s demand for jury trial. The Court emphasized that the husband knew of the trial date and had no legitimate reason for not attending. Though the husband argued that by not attending he did not intend to waive the demand for jury trial, the Court stated that his actions were an implicit waiver and the trial court was authorized to strike his demand.

Child Support and Extracurricular Activities

2010-01-19T20:10:24Z

An important issue for many parents is how payment for children’s extracurricular activities is handled in relation to child support. The Georgia Supreme Court recently addressed this issue in Turner v. Turner. Turner v. Turner¸ 285 Ga. 866 (2009). In that case, after nine years of marriage and two children, the parties divorced with the mother receiving primary custody of the children and the father obligated to pay child support. In addition to his child support obligation, the father was ordered to pay 2/3 of the children’s extracurricular activities. The father appealed, contending that he was “paying twice for the cost of extracurricular activities because such costs are included in the presumptive amount of child support.” Id. at 867.

The Georgia Supreme Court agreed, stating that “[t]he language of OCGA § 19-6-15 (i) (2) (J) (ii) makes clear that a portion of the basic child support obligation is intended to cover average amounts of special expenses for raising children, including the cost of extracurricular activities.” Id. The Court referred further to the child support statute, clarifying that if the trial court determines that the full amount of special expenses (which includes extracurricular activities) exceeds 7% of the basic child support obligation, the additional amount must be considered a deviation addressed on Schedule E of the Child Support Worksheets with specific findings as to why such deviation is necessary. Id. The Georgia Supreme Court stated that the way the trial court handled extracurricular activities, by including an additional provision in the final judgment and decree of divorce apportioning them, was improper under the current child support guidelines.

The treatment of extracurricular activities is an important concept to keep in mind. In looking at a requested deviation for these activities, the court is going to want and need justification for these activities, especially if the payor is claiming that these activities are unnecessary for the children.

Importance of unambiguous child support language

2010-01-12T20:17:58Z

We recently represented a husband in a successful appeal of his dismissed child support modification action. The parties were divorced in 2007 and, according to the final judgment and decree of divorce, the wife was awarded primary custody of the 4 children and the husband was obligated to pay child support. Specifically, the final judgment and decree stated that child support would be “due and payable. . . until such time as the youngest minor child dies, marries, enters the military, attains the age of eighteen, or is otherwise emancipated, whichever first occurs; provided, however, that in the event that any of the minor children turn 18 years of age while still in high school, [Husband's] child support obligations shall continue for that child until such time as the child graduates from high school, but in no event to extend past the child's twentieth birthday.” (emphasis added) Grenevitch v. Grenevitch, S09A0320

When the parties’ eldest child turned 18 years old, the husband filed a Complaint for Modification of Child Support stating that his child support obligation should be modified downward accordingly. The trial court refused to give the husband an opportunity to present evidence of whether the child had turned 18 and graduated from high school and, rather, dismissed the modification action, finding no substantial change warranting a modification and awarded the wife attorney’s fees.

The Supreme Court of Georgia reversed the trial court’s ruling, thereby allowing the husband’s modification action to proceed. The Court looked at the plain language of the divorce decree and found no ambiguity, reasoning that the language shows that the parties contemplated a change in the husband’s child support obligation. Since the parties contemplated a change, the husband should have been able to present evidence showing that a change was warranted. This case shows the importance of the language in your divorce decree. The court is going to look at the actual language of the Order regardless of whether you or your spouse believes you have agreed to something else. If something is important to you, make sure it is in the Order and written very clearly so that it cannot be misinterpreted.

Jurisdiction over custody modification when parents live in different states

2010-01-05T20:13:21Z

One of the most confusing aspects of child custody cases can be where the case should be filed when the parents live in different states. Generally, in regards to custody modification actions, the law limits a parent’s ability to terminate the continuing jurisdiction of the court that made the original custody determination in order to prevent the noncustodial parent from trying to use his or her “home jurisdiction advantage” to modify custody to the disadvantage of the custodial parent. There is, however, one exception to this general rule which provides that a Georgia court "has temporary emergency jurisdiction [to make a child custody determination] if the child is present in this state and . . . it is necessary in an emergency to protect the child because the child . . . is subjected to or threatened with mistreatment or abuse." O.C.G.A. §19-9-64(a).

The Georgia Court of Appeals recently addressed this issue in Taylor v. Curl (A09A0749). In that case, subsequent to the parties’ Jackson County divorce, the mother moved with the children to Florida and the father moved to Walker County. While the children were visiting the father, he filed a petition for temporary and emergency custody of his children in the Superior Court of Walker County, citing mistreatment and abuse of the children by their mother. The mother appealed arguing that Walker County was not the proper venue for the custody modification. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s ruling granting temporary custody to the father, thereby affirming jurisdiction. Since the father met the two requirements outlined in O.C.G.A. §19-9-64(a), the trial court properly exercised temporary, emergency jurisdiction.

Georgia Supreme Court reverses Order of Contempt entered by Atlanta trial court

2009-12-29T20:07:09Z

On April 28, 2009, the Georgia Supreme Court reversed an Order of the Dekalb County Superior Court finding a wife in contempt of the equitable distribution portion of the parties’ divorce decree. Farris v. Farris (S09A0302). Following a November 13, 2007 bench trial, Judge Castellani made an oral ruling regarding equitable distribution of the parties’ assets, but did not formalize this ruling until over a month later. The divorce decree provided that the wife shall place the marital residence on the market and shall control all aspects of the listing and sale for six months. If the residence did not sell within six months, the husband would take over control of the listing and sale, and this process shall repeat every six months until the house sold. The parties were to equally split the proceeds from the sale and the house was not to be sold for less than $650,000.00.

After the oral ruling but before entry of the final decree of divorce, the husband offered to purchase the wife’s interest in the house for $325,000, but the wife rejected this offer. Shortly after the final decree was entered, the wife accepted an offer on the house from the parties’ daughter in the amount of $650,150, which the husband rejected. The wife then filed a motion to hold the husband in contempt for rejecting this offer and the husband filed a motion for contempt against the wife for rejecting his offer. The Judge found the wife in contempt.

The Georgia Supreme Court reversed, stating adamantly that the wife could not be held in contempt of the divorce decree because there was no divorce decree entered at the time of husband’s offer. “Before a person may be held in contempt for violating a court order, the order should inform him in definite terms as to the duties thereby imposed upon him, and the command must therefore be express rather than implied. [Cit.]" (Punctuation omitted.) Hall v. Nelson, 282 Ga. 441, 444 (3) (651 SE2d 72) (2007).” Simply put, an oral Order is not sufficient for contempt. A person is not bound by a divorce decree until it is in writing and entered by the court.

Premarital cohabitation considered in determining alimony

2009-12-21T19:52:05Z

On June 1, 2009, the Georgia Supreme Court reaffirmed the great discretion of the trial courts in determining the amount and length of alimony. In Sprouse v. Sprouse (S09F0709), the parties entered into a common law marriage in Alabama in 1996, which was terminated by divorce in 2001. Subsequently, the parties resumed living together and married on March 5, 2005. Approximately two years later, the husband filed for divorce and, after a bench trial, the wife was awarded alimony for 13 years. The husband appealed, contending that the alimony award was excessive in amount and duration in light of the parties’ relatively short marriage. Specifically, the husband argued that the trial court abused its discretion in considering the entire length of time the parties had been together, rather than just the length of the marriage.

Unlike child support, there is no statutory formula for determining alimony. Rather, there are eight statutory factors that the Judge can consider in awarding the amount and length of alimony, if any. O.C.G.A. §19-6-5(a). http://www.atlantadivorceattorneyblog.com/2008/10/what_are_the_factors_in_determ.html#more Here, the Supreme Court found that the trial court had discretion to consider length of the parties’ entire relationship as a factor in determining alimony under O.C.G.A. §19-6-5(a)(8), a catch-all provision allowing the court to consider “such other relevant factors as the court deems equitable and proper.” Thus, the Georgia Supreme Court reaffirmed that “[i]n the absence of any mathematical formula, fact-finders are given a wide latitude in fixing the amount of alimony . . . and to this end they are to use their experience as enlightened persons in judging the amount necessary for support under the evidence as disclosed by the record and all the facts and circumstances of the case.” Arkwright v. Arkwright, 284 Ga. 545, 546 (2) (a) (668 SE2d 709) (2008).

How to Effectively Use Mediation to Settle with Your Contested Canton, Georgia Divorce – Part V

2009-12-07T12:15:15Z

In part five of our ten part series on how to effectively use mediation in your contested divorce case, we will continue to examine steps to take to make sure you and your Atlanta divorce lawyer are ready for mediation. This blog will also work if you and your spouse plan on using mediation to settle your case without an Atlanta Divorce lawyer. In this blog, we go into how to handle yourself at mediation and what usually goes on at mediation.

Mediations typically start with an opening statement by either side. Most of the time, you should have your Atlanta divorce lawyer make the statement to keep it factually accurate and non-inflammatory. It does not do any good to increase the tension at the beginning of mediation. Avoid an opening statement full of vile accusations, conduct issues, and inaccuracies. This has no effect other than to sabotage mediation; when the whole purpose of mediation is to avoid that type of conflict.

After the parties have given opening statements, the mediators tend to meet privately with the parties in what is called a caucus. In the caucus session, the more inflammatory facts can be made known to the mediator; and can be communicated to your spouse in a much more pleasant and less hostile manner by the mediator - rather than the opposing side.

]]> During the process, you must show restraint and remain polite to your spouse, his or her divorce lawyer, and the mediator. You catch more honey than you do with salt. Undue hostility only halts or hinders the mediation process. Even if you do not like the other lawyer, or your spouse, you can only help your case by remaining polite and cooperative. The goal of negotiation is not to score points off of the other side, but to work towards a mutually agreeable resolution. Remaining positive and polite is a prerequisite for achieving such a result. Moreover, politeness may help settle the case in ways you cannot predict. If your spouse has spent the past few months telling their Atlanta divorce lawyer what a vile despicable person you are and you come to mediation completely the opposite, your spouse’s divorce lawyer may begin to have concerns that his or her client has seriously exaggerated their position in the case, which could ultimately assist with reaching a settlement.

Sometimes mediation is a slow process. Often times, caucuses take an inordinately long time, at least from your prospective; and you think you are doing nothing but "wasting time". To the contrary, you are letting the process work, and you are waiting while the mediator is listening to and making points with the other side. Remember, the longer the mediator is caucusing with the opposition, the more information you are likely to receive in your caucus about the other party's position. Only with this type of full information can mediation be successful.

It often takes more than one session for mediation to work. Mediation of difficult cases is not an instantaneous event; and sometimes only small progress may be made at the first mediation session. You should expect subsequent sessions in order to reach the desired goal.

Many judges state before a trial begins that they do not have the time to really get to know either party, nor do they have the time to understand what they have been through during their marriage. They do not have the resources to obtain information about each parties schedule if custody or visitation is contested. Often, their orders look like someone took a crowbar to a block of mortar to try and carve out a sculpture. At mediation, the parties have the ability to take the time to draft a settlement agreement with surgical precision in comparison to taking their case to trial.

How to Effectively Use Mediation to Settle with Your Contested Canton Divorce – Part IV

2009-12-03T12:16:57Z

In part four of our ten part series on how to effectively use mediation in your contested divorce case, we will continue to examine steps to take to make sure you and your Atlanta divorce lawyer are ready for mediation. This blog will also work if you and your spouse plan on using mediation to settle your case without an Atlanta Divorce lawyer. In this blog, we go into a the importance of prioritizing issues that are important to you.

Being prepared involves setting priorities. It is important that you understand at the outset, which are the most important goals to obtain through settlement. If primary physical custody of your children means more to you than anything else, you both need to be clear that this means that you might need to make certain financial concessions in order to obtain custody. Setting clear priorities before negotiation helps both you focus on what is most important to you, and allows your Atlanta divorce attorney to prepare your strategy.

If there have been any settlement negotiations before the mediation, you should outline them in a concise manner. Often the best way is by using a chart so that on one piece of paper each person’s position on each separate issue can be tracked. This will often help in two areas. First, your Atlanta divorce lawyer may see a trend or strategy in your spouse’s negotiation. Second, it will enable the mediator, who has no prior knowledge of the case, to look at what has occurred, the positions taken by you and your spouse, where there are agreements, where there are differences, and more importantly how different those differences are. This tells the mediator exactly where attention needs to be placed and where the time, energy and fort of the mediation need to be spent. It is a quick snapshot of what has transpired. Even more important, it is a road map of where mediation needs to go and, hopefully, how to get there.

How to Effectively Use Mediation to Settle with Your Atlanta Divorce – Part III

2009-11-16T16:18:18Z

In part three of our ten part series on how to effectively use mediation in your contested divorce case, we will continue to examine steps to take to make sure you and your Atlanta divorce lawyer are ready for mediation. This blog will also work if you and your spouse plan on using mediation to settle your case without an Atlanta Divorce lawyer. In this blog, we go into a little more detail on the preparation necessary for an effective mediation in a contested divorce case.

Budget Accuracy. As Atlanta divorce lawyers, we find that one of the greatest problems in mediation is "inflated" or "deflated" budgets, which have absolutely no relation to reality or historical spending levels. If budgets represent actual numbers and historical levels of expenditures, mediation has a much greater chance of success. You want to avoid paying your Atlanta divorce lawyer an hourly rate to "haggle" over the accuracy of budget numbers. If you have not been the one who has taken care of the finances during the divorce, make sure that you have requested the information from your spouse to obtain the documents necessary to prepare an accurate budget. If he won’t turn them over, your Atlanta divorce lawyer can seek this information through formal discovery.

Have extra copies of all documents. Do not go to mediation with only one copy of a document that you intend to rely upon. Have multiple copies so that everyone can look at the same documents, can make notes on them, and go over those documents in the initial caucus. If you plan on making the extra copies yourself, make sure you tell your Atlanta divorce lawyer ahead of time.

]]> Highlight the Document. If there are specific portions of a document you want to emphasize for the mediation or your Atlanta divorce lawyer, highlight it ahead of time. This draws attention to exactly what you want to emphasize; and makes it clear and concise. It also facilitates future reference to these important portions of the documents.

IF POSSIBLE, "BLOW-UP" DOCUMENTS THAT ARE CRITICAL TO YOUR CASE. This forces the mediator to look at your document, and it also emphasizes its importance of that document to your position. If you have two (2) or three (3) enlargements, then those documents tend to take on a "larger than life" role. They may well become more and more important as the mediation goes on. People tend to pay more attention to the larger documents than they do the smaller ones. Discuss this with your Atlanta divorce lawyer ahead of time. Some mediators are better than others and do not require documents to be blown up.