Atlanta Divorce Attorney Blog

Holidays are special times for most families and one of the most difficult things for divorcing parents to come to terms with is the fact that they will not be spending all of the holidays with their children every year after the divorce. This can be difficult for the children as well as the parents so it is important to create a schedule where each parent has significant time with the children during the holidays.

The following is an example of a holiday visitation schedule that has worked for many parents:

In even numbered years, the Father has Thanksgiving and the second week of Christmas Vacation/Winter Break (beginning the afternoon of Christmas Day), while the Mother has Easter/Spring Break and the first week of Christmas Vacation/Winter Break (ending the afternoon of Christmas Day). In odd numbered years, the Father has Easter/Spring Break and the first week of Christmas Vacation/Winter Break (ending the afternoon of Christmas Day), while the Mother has Thanksgiving and the second week of Christmas Vacation/Winter Break (beginning the afternoon of Christmas Day). The Mother has Mother’s Day every year, and the Father has Father’s Day every year. Any holiday that falls on a Monday (i.e. Martin Luther King, Jr. Day, Memorial Day, Labor Day) will belong to the parent who has the children the preceding weekend.

If you are going through a divorce and you and your spouse have children together, an inevitable question will be: how often will I see my children? It is most common for one parent to have primary physical custody with the other parent having secondary physical custody and visitation. In discussing the custody and visitation arrangement with your spouse or divorce attorney, you will likely hear the term “standard visitation.”

“Standard visitation” is generally every other weekend with one overnight during the week in which the non-custodial parent does not have weekend visitation. Standard visitation includes an equal split of all holidays. Each parent generally has half of the holidays each year with the holidays rotating every other year. For example, one parent will have Thanksgiving with the children in even numbered years and the other parent will have Thanksgiving with the children in odd numbered years. In addition, with standard visitation, each parent generally has blocks of extended time (2-3 weeks) during the summer for vacations with the children.

Our divorce law firm likes to use “standard visitation” as a starting point for custody and visitation discussions as the “standard visitation” outlined above does not work for all families. Some families want different holidays addressed while work commitments may keep some parents from having overnights with the children during the week. Whatever your family’s situation, it is important to find a visitation schedule that works well for both parents as well as the children.

If you are involved in a contested custody case in Georgia, chances are that a Guardian ad Litem has been appointed in your case. Over the course of the next several blogs, we will discuss several do’s and don’ts concerning how to interact with the Guardian to hopefully achieve a favorable recommendation from him or her in your Georgia contested custody case.

Since the Guardian’s ultimate recommendation is given a tremendous amount of weight by the Court, it is important that you do not do the following things:

1. Do not pressure the children’s teachers, counselors, or day care providers to tell the Guardian what a great person you are.
2. Do not ask the Guardian for his or her decision, because it will be presented in a report.
3. Do not talk to the children about what they are going to say to the Guardian.
4. Do not constantly belittle the other party, because it can back-fire against you. You could be accused of parental alienation. If, however, you have some documentary information that could help the Guardian make a decision, you can provide that to him or her, after having your custody lawyer review it.
5. Do not call, mail or e-mail the Guardian on a daily basis.
6. Do not try to pressure any psychologist that the children may be seeing.
7. Do not try to control the Guardian’s investigation. Guardian’s in contested custody cases in Georgia are usually well trained and versed in what to look for in order to make a recommendation on whom should have custody. If the other party claims you are controlling, you will only be proving their case.

On March 23, 2009, the Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed the trial court’s denial of the wife’s motion for new trial in her divorce action in Rembert v. Rembert (S08F1582). Specifically, the wife alleged that the trial court erred in granting final decision making authority to the husband, who was the primary physical custodian of the parties’ children, and in awarding primary physical custody to the husband.

In regard to decision making, the wife argued that the parties did not truly have joint legal custody because the husband had final decision making authority. The Supreme Court disagreed, reaffirming a prior holding that the language of the statute governing legal custody “clearly vests in the trial court discretion to decide which parent should be empowered to make final decisions where the parents are unable to agree.” Citing Frazier v. Frazier, 280 Ga. 687, 690 (2006). As the primary physical custodian, it was appropriate that the father had final decision making authority in the likely event that the parties would not agree.

In regard to primary physical custody, the Supreme Court held that it would not disturb the trial court’s judgment awarding custody to the father, who had a stable home and a job with a regular schedule, instead of the mother, who was dating a married man, was a full time student with substantial debt, and had threatened the life of a neighbor.

Simply put, joint custody means that both parents share equal input and/or spend equal amount of time with the child/children. Sole custody is essentially the opposite – when only one parent has the decision making power and the child or children live almost all of the time with that one parent. Custody is actually broken into two categories (physical and legal) and then labeled joint or sole within each category. Physical custody describes where a child lives most of the time and what parent will have visitation, whereas legal custody describes access to records and major decisions such as to schooling, religion, extracurricular activities and non-emergency health procedures.

It is most common to see joint custody in the category of legal custody. Joint legal custody means that both parents have input and should be involved in major decisions. Per O.C.G.A. § 19-9-1, (Georgia parenting plan law) there must be a designated tiebreaker or final decision maker if the parties cannot agree (usually the primary physical custodian). This prevents the parties from needing the Court’s intervention every time there is no agreement on any one issue.

In the category of physical custody, the parties must designate a primary physical custodian and typically do not label physical custody under the “sole vs. joint” designation. The primary physical custodian is the person the child/children live with most of the time and the noncustodial parent has visitation or parenting time. According to O.C.G.A. § 19-6-15 (Georgia child support law), even if the parties share equal amount of time with the child/children, the Court must still designate a primary custodian.

Continue reading "Child Custody: Joint Custody vs Sole Custody in Georgia" »

On March 13, 2009, the Georgia Court of Appeals affirmed the juvenile court’s termination of a father’s parental rights in In the Interest of D.F. (A08A2371). The father challenged the sufficiency of the evidence of his parental misconduct or inability, or that termination of parental rights would be in the children’s best interests. The Court of Appeals disagreed with the father, holding that “[t]he evidence authorized the juvenile court to find that although the father has not engaged in any abuse or intentional misconduct whatsoever toward his children, and although he has made a sincere and food faith effort to obtain reunification with the children by meeting his parental responsibilities, his mental infirmities simply render him incapable of parenting the children without the full-time assistance that is unavailable to him.” The Court, thus, found that terminating the father’s parental rights was in the best interests of the children.

On February 10, 2009, in Hall v. Wellborn (A08A1800), the Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s dismissal of a mother’s Petition to Enforce Custody due to lack of jurisdiction. In December 2003, the mother divorced her former husband and was awarded custody of the minor child who, through paternity testing, was found not to be the child of the former husband. Shortly thereafter, the mother and child moved to Florida where the child’s biological father lived. The father filed a paternity action in Florida seeking sole custody and was awarded primary physical custody of the child.

Shortly thereafter, the mother filed an action in Georgia seeking to enforce the original Georgia custody Order. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s dismissal of this action because the Georgia court had lost continuing, exclusive jurisdiction under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA). Under the UCCJEA, a Georgia court that makes an initial child custody determination maintains continuing, exclusive jurisdiction over subsequent custody matters except when neither the child nor the child’s parents have a significant connection to the state, or when neither the child nor the child’s parents presently reside in the state. Thus, Georgia lost jurisdiction and Florida was the proper state in which to bring this custody action.

On February 23, 2009, the Georgia Court of Appeals affirmed the Dekalb county juvenile court’s deprivation ruling in In the Interest of Z.D. (A09A0487). The Dekalb juvenile court based its deprivation finding on the following evidence: (1) one child was punished for bedwetting by “either sitting on the toilet for prolonged periods of time or being made to sit in cold bath water;” (2) the father did not seek medical treatment for the children’s extremely unusual eating behaviors and, instead, beat the children with a belt if they ate school cafeteria food; (3) the father refused to agree to a home visit; (4) the father tried to withdraw the children from school after reports of suspected abuse; and (5) the father did not follow the DFCS safety plan. Based on the above, the Court of Appeals found that the deprivation finding by the juvenile court was supported by clear and convincing evidence.

On February 23, 2009, the Georgia Court of Appeals affirmed the Dekalb county juvenile court’s deprivation ruling in In the Interest of N.H. (A08A1759). During the course of DFCS’ investigation of a teenage mother and her child which raised significant concerns, the DFCS case worker secured the services of a parenting support company to instruct the mother on what to feed infants and, generally, how to care for infants. During the parenting specialist’s visit to the home, she noted that the mother fed the infant inappropriate food despite instruction that it was inappropriate. As a result of the investigation, the juvenile court found that the mother “had intellectual limitations evidenced by her continued improper feeding of the child.” Despite the mother’s objection to the deprivation finding because the parenting specialist assigned by DFCS only visited the home once, the Court of Appeals found the evidence sufficient to support a finding of deprivation.

On January 30, 2009, the Court of Appeals vacated the trial court’s award of custody to the child’s maternal grandmother instead of her father. In Galtieri v. O’Dell (A08A1822), the biological father, who had legitimated the child, contended that the trial court erred in its determination because it failed to find that awarding custody to him would harm the child.

The Court of Appeals agreed and vacated the trial court’s ruling, stating that “it is clear that the trial court failed to apply the proper legal analysis for determining whether custody should be awarded to…the maternal grandmother, rather than…the biological father.” Specifically, the Court pointed to O.C.G.A. §19-7-1(b.1), which establishes a rebuttable presumption in custody disputes between a biological parent and a third party relative that it is in the child’s best interest to award custody to the parent. To win custody, the third party relative must show by clear and convincing evidence that awarding custody to the parent would harm the child. The Court of Appeals found that the trial court’s statement that “from the personal experience of the court…it would be detrimental to the child to move from Georgia” was insufficient to meet this standard.

In In the Interest of R.J.M. (A08A1919), a mother appealed the Order of the Fulton county juvenile court sustaining a petition for deprivation to which she stipulated and which keeps the child in the custody of Fulton county DFCS. After the minor child was sexually abused by her father, DFCS filed a Petition for Deprivation and the child was removed from the home. Subsequently, an Amended Petition for Deprivation was filed, wherein the mother stipulated that the child was deprived, and the parties submitted a proposed Protective Order to the Judge that would allow the child to remain living with her mother. The court reviewed the evidence and the proposed Protective Order, but decided not to return custody to the mother.

The mother appealed, contending that she stipulated to the deprivation only because the agreement was for the child to be returned to her. On February 10, 2009, the Georgia Court of Appeals affirmed the Order of the juvenile court, holding that “[h]ad the juvenile court merely followed the parties’ recommended disposition despite reservations it had about immediately returning R.J.M. to the mother, the juvenile court would have acted contrary to its fundamental obligation in deprivation proceedings to protect the welfare of the child.”

On January 26, 2009, the Supreme Court of Georgia issued a ruling in Amerson v. Vandiver (S08A1707) regarding a Father’s agreement to termination of his parental rights in a divorce action. In March 2004, the parties entered into a settlement agreement in their divorce action wherein the Mother would have sole, permanent custody of the children and the Father agreed to the termination of his parental rights. Four years later, the Father moved to set aside the Final Judgment and Decree of Divorce alleging that the superior court lacked jurisdiction to terminate his parental rights.

After the superior court agreed with the Father and set aside the part of the judgment terminating his parental rights, the Mother appealed. The Supreme Court of Georgia pointed out that the juvenile courts, not the superior court, have sole jurisdiction for terminating parental rights, except in the case of adoption proceedings. Nonetheless, the Court went on to say that “[t]he stability of the family and of society demands that one who intends to attack an apparently valid decree of divorce should proceed with the utmost promptness.” The Court reversed the superior court’s ruling and held that the Father’s acts of invoking superior court jurisdiction for his divorce and entering into a settlement agreement which the superior court incorporated into its final decree, coupled with the Father’s four year delay in trying to set the decree aside, prevented him from attacking the agreement.

Adultery on the part of one spouse can affect many aspects of a divorce in Georgia, including alimony, equitable distribution, and even child custody. If a spouse’s adultery was the cause of the divorce, the adulterous party is barred from receiving alimony. Thus, if you can prove that your spouse committed adultery and that the adultery caused the separation; your spouse will not be successful on an alimony claim in Court.

Alimony also comes into play in equitable distribution. Generally, equitable distribution results in splitting the marital estate 50/50, unless there is a reason to give one spouse a greater portion of the marital estate. One reason to give one spouse a disproportionate amount of the marital estate is the bad conduct of the other party, which can include adultery. If an adulterous spouse committed egregious adultery in the presence of the other spouse and/or children, this conduct may result in an unequal split of the marital estate. Similarly, if the adulterous spouse spent substantial marital funds on his or her paramour, the other spouse could get a disproportionate amount of the marital estate to make up the difference and even punish the adulterous spouse.

Alimony can also affect child custody. In determining child custody, the Court is primarily concerned with the best interests of the children. If a parent has committed adultery in the presence of the children and brings his or her paramour around the children, this parent is acting contrary to the children’s best interests, which could result in that parent losing a custody battle.

On November 17, 2008, the Georgia Court of Appeals affirmed a Juvenile Court’s finding of deprivation under Georgia law and the removal of the child from her parents’ custody. The trial court specifically held that the child was deprived because the child was sexually abused by her Father and because the Mother failed to protect the child from this abuse.

In In the Interest of B.H. (A08A1102), the Georgia Court of Appeals stressed that, in reviewing a judgment determining that child is deprived, “we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the juvenile court’s judgment to determine whether any rational trier of fact could have found by clear and convincing evidence that the child was deprived.” Citing In the Interest of S.S., 232 Ga. App. 287, 289 (1998). Using this standard, the Court of Appeals affirmed the finding of deprivation as to the Father, referring to testimony of another child into the house as to the abuse perpetrated by the Father and holding that a rational trier of fact could have found deprivation by clear and convincing evidence. The Court of Appeals applied the same standard and reasoning to the deprivation finding against the Mother, referring to specific evidence that the Mother had “manipulated [the child] to ensure the return of the father to the home without regard to whether he had sexually abused the child.”

As an Atlanta divorce lawyer, our law firm is often confronted with dealing with issues of adultery as they related to a divorce. In Georgia, adultery on the part of one spouse can affect many aspects of a divorce proceeding, including alimony, equitable distribution, and even child custody. In order to get to the point that adultery will affect a divorce case, you must prove the adultery, which can be very difficult. Since there is rarely direct proof of adultery, most times it must be proved by circumstantial evidence.

If you and your spouse share cell phone accounts, look at the itemized statements to see if there are substantial calls to a certain number. If you share an email address, you can look at incoming and outgoing emails. If you do not share phone or email accounts, we do not recommend breaking into your spouse’s account if he or she has not given you access, as this could be a criminal violation and the resulting information will likely be inadmissible in Court.

Once a divorce case is filed, however, you will be able to obtain information from your spouse through discovery that may provide evidence of his or her adultery. You can request anything that is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, which includes phone records, emails, other correspondence, bank statements, and credit card statements. Phone records may show numerous calls to a paramour. Emails may show correspondence between your spouse and a paramour. Bank and credit card statements may show evidence of substantial funds spent on flowers, hotels, and other gifts that you did not receive.

Continue reading "How can I prove my spouse’s adultery? " »

In Rumley-Miawama v. Miawama (S08F1541), the Supreme Court of Georgia heard a Wife’s appeal from the judgment in her divorce case. The Wife was unhappy with the visitation, child support and equitable division of property portions of the trial court’s judgment.

In regard to child support, the Supreme Court affirmed the trial court’s decision not to apply a deviation from the child support guidelines for equal parenting time and held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in choosing not to apply this deviation. The Supreme Court pointed out that the trial court did use its discretion to give the Wife a deviation for travel expenses.

The Supreme Court of Georgia did agree with the Wife that the trial court erred in including a self-executing change of visitation provision in its judgments. The visitation portion of the judgment, which takes effect if Wife moves out of state and significantly limits her visitation, was reversed, as the Supreme Court held that it failed to reflect consideration of the best interests of the children, which is of paramount importance in Georgia.

Continue reading "Georgia Case Law Update – Visitation, Child Support, Marital Property " »

Our final blog entry in our Atlanta Divorce Lawyers Guide to Divorce and Family Law Cases in Fulton County, Georgia is in regards to the Fulton County’s Guardian Ad Litem program. A Guardian Ad Litem is an attorney who has had at least 20 hours of specialized training for child welfare and custody issues. In cases involving contested child custody, modifications of custody, modification of visitation, allegations of child neglect or child abuse, the Court can assign a Guardian Ad Litem to more closely evaluate the situation and report back to the court its findings. The Court or the Guardian Ad Litem can order psychological evaluations and drug testing if applicable to help in making a custody determination.

The cost of a Guardian Ad Litem can be rather high for most divorces in Georgia. Litigants should be aware that Fulton County offers a Guardian Ad Litem (GAL) at a reduced hourly rate.

According to O.C.G.A. § 19-6-2, you can be awarded attorney’s fees in a divorce, but the award of attorney’s fees is ultimately decided by the judge assigned in your case. After the judge hears testimony from both you and your spouse, he or she will look at the facts of the case and base his or her decision on one factor – the financial circumstances of both parties in a divorce. O.C.G.A. § 19-6-2(a)(1). This is similar to the award of alimony in a divorce case because the judge will look at both parties’ incomes and decide on one party’s ability or inability to pay attorney’s fees and the other party’s need for attorney’s fees. Even though you may ask for attorney’s fees, there is no guarantee that the judge will actually grant attorney’s fees in your case.

If the judge awards attorney’s fees in your divorce, the judge will sign a Final Order showing the amount of attorney’s fees that your spouse is required to pay. One of the disadvantages about the judge awarding attorney’s fees in your case is that amount of attorney’s fees that the judge awards in his Final Order may or may not reflect the total amount of attorney’s fees that you incurred in your divorce according to § 19-6-2(a)(2). The judge could actually award an amount less than what you incurred.

When the judge is determining the amount of attorney’s fees, he or she may look at several factors. The judge may review the invoices from both you and your spouse’s attorneys and determine if the amount that you incurred is fair. When reviewing the invoices, the judge may look at the hourly rates of staff at your law firm, such as the attorney, associate attorney, and/or paralegal working on your case, as well as the charges that you incurred as compared to those hourly rates and charges that your spouse incurred from the opposing law firm. As we mentioned previously in this blog, it is difficult to determine whether someone will be awarded attorney’s fees since the award is based on the sole discretion of the judge and because each divorce case and each judge is different, it is difficult to determine whether he or she will award attorney’s fees in your particular divorce case.

The exact statutory authorization for attorney’s fees under the Official Code of Georgia is:

Continue reading "Attorneys Fees in a Georgia Divorce under O.C.G.A. § 19-6-2 " »

When going through a divorce in Georgia with minor children involved, there are two categories of custody that you must consider: legal custody and physical custody. Legal custody has to do with a parent’s rights and responsibilities to make major decisions concerning the child, including the child’s health care, education, extracurricular activities and religious training. Physical custody has to do with where the child is physically living.

It is very common to see joint legal custody in divorce cases because it allows both parents to have equal rights and responsibilities for major decisions which, in turn, provides both parents the opportunity to remain involved in their child’s upbringing. With joint legal custody, one parent may have final decision making authority over major decisions in the event the parents are unable to agree. Alternatively, the parents can split final decision making authority with, for example, one parent having final decision making authority over education and extracurricular activities and the other parent having final decision making authority over health care and religious upbringing.

In Georgia, it is not as common to see joint physical custody as it is to see joint legal custody. Joint physical custody means that the child has substantially equal time and contact with each parent. In some situations, due to a parent’s work schedule or a child’s extracurricular commitments, joint physical custody is not practical. Parents should work together to come up with a custody and visitation schedule that works best for their particular situation while at the same time furthers the best interests of their children. Parents who do choose joint physical custody must work well together and have good communication as this arrangement will necessarily require them to see each other more often and cooperate continuously for the benefit of the children.

This blog entry regarding tax issues related to a divorce is intended to alert you to issues to think about and provide some basic information. Before you sign any tax return or take any action with respect to your federal or state income returns, please review your situation with your current tax advisor.

Change of Mailing Address
You may officially notify the I.R.S. that you have changed your mailing address from the address used on your last tax return by filing I.R.S. Form 8822.

Alimony
Spousal support or alimony is taxable to the recipient and deductible from the income of the payor if all I.R.S. requirements are met. Lump sum alimony is not deductable. For more information see Divorced or Separated Individuals - IRS's Form 504.

Child Support
Child support payments are not deductible from the income of the payor or taxable to the recipient. For more information see Divorced or Separated Individuals - IRS's Form 504.

Dependency Exemption for Minor Children
Unless specifically addressed in your Decree, generally the custodial parent will be entitled to claim the dependency exemption for the minor children on his or her income tax return. The custodial parent may execute I.R.S. Form 8332, releasing the dependency exemption to the non-custodial parent. Release of Claim to Exemption
for Child of Divorced or Separated Parents - I.R.S. Form 8332.

Continue reading "Divorce and Taxes" »

Under Georgia law, both parties in a divorce are required to attend a parenting seminar in Georgia if the parties have children under the age of 18 due to the volatile nature of divorce and the impact it has on children. See Uniform Superior Court Rule 24.8. The parties are not required to attend the seminar together - they can take it at separate locations and on different dates. Even though the content of the parenting seminar is basically the same throughout the state, each county manages its own parenting seminar program. Generally, the topics addressed are how to reduce stress for children during a divorce, visitation recommendations, financial obligations, conflict management, the changing parental roles during a divorce, stress indicators for children, and the needs and age appropriate expectations of children going through a divorce.

You can find more information for parenting seminars in Metropolitan Atlanta counties from our blog at:

• Cobb County
• DeKalb County
• Forsyth County
• Gwinnett County
• Fulton County

Please note that there are only a limited number of seminars offered each month so it is important to review the schedule and try to attend the next available seminar. If you cannot attend the parenting seminar for the county in which your divorce is filed, most counties allow you to take the seminar in any other county in the State of Georgia to receive credit. If you take the seminar in another county, however, you will need to bring the civil action file number assigned to your case with you.

Continue reading "Atlanta Parenting Seminar Information" »

Forsyth County (Cumming) and Cherokee County (Ball Ground, Canton, and Woodstock) are part of the 9th judicial district. All of the counties in this 9th judicial district work jointly to offer their seminar for divorcing parents throughout the judicial district. They are currently offering seminars in:

• Cumming at the Forsyth County Library located at 585 Dahlonega Street, Cumming, GA 30040
• Canton at the R. T. Jones Memorial Library located at 116 Brown Industrial Parkway, Canton, GA 30114
• and in Blairsville, Clarkesville, Dahlonega, Ellijay, and Gainesville.

The cost of the seminar is currently $50.00 per person. You can find additional information about these seminars at 9th Judicial Office of Alternative Dispute Resolution website.

Many people assume that the mother automatically receives custody of the minor children in a divorce whether she is a fit or unfit parent and the father will never receive custody of the children. Contrary to what some people assume, the law is required to be gender neutral when evaluating custody.

In Georgia, the judge assigned to a divorce or modification action must make a determination of who should get custody based upon the broad concept of what is in the “minor child’s best interest.” When determining the best interest of the child, the judge will analyze a long list of factors in order to make his/her decision. The following are the list of factors for a judge to consider when awarding custody under Georgia family law:

(A) The love, affection, bonding, and emotional ties existing between each parent and the child;

(B) The love, affection, bonding, and emotional ties existing between the child and his or her siblings, half siblings, and stepsiblings and the residence of such other children;

(C) The capacity and disposition of each parent to give the child love, affection, and guidance and to continue the education and rearing of the child;

Continue reading "Georgia Child Custody" »

Gwinnett County (Buford, Dacula, Duluth, Lawrenceville, Lilburn, Norcross, Snellville, and Suwanee) offers its Parenting Seminar in order to help parties involved in a divorce with minor children met their mandatory parenting time seminar at the Gwinnett Justice and Administration Center, 75 Langley Drive, Lawrenceville, Georgia 30045. Day seminars are held in conference room A West Wing. Evening seminars are held Jury assembly Room East Wing.

One unique fact about the Gwinnett seminars is they are offer either a four hour weekday seminar (from 9:00 am to 1:00 p.m.) or two two-hour evening sessions (from 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.). The cost of the seminar is currently $30.00 per person and registration MUST be received prior to the day of the seminar. You can find additional information and register online for these seminars at the Gwinnett County Parenting Seminar website.

Fulton County (Alpharetta, Atlanta, Johns Creek, Milton, Roswell) offers its Family in Transition seminar in order to help parties involved in a divorce with minor children met their mandatory parenting time seminar at three different locations in the county. Currently, it is offering a:

• Saturday morning seminar once per month from 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. at the Downtown Justice Center Building located at 160 Pryor Street, S.W., Courtroom G33, Atlanta, Georgia.
• Weekday morning seminar once per month from 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. at the South Fulton Service Center located at 5600 Stonewall Tell Road, College Park, Georgia in the auditorium.
• Weekday evening seminar once per month from 4:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. at the North Fulton Service Center located at 7741 Roswell Road, Atlanta, Georgia in the auditorium.

Please note that both the North and South service center locations require pre-registration. The cost of the seminar is currently $30.00 per person. You can find additional information about these seminars at Fulton County Families in Transition program website.

Cobb County (Acworth, Austell, Kennesaw, Marietta, Powder Springs and Smyrna) offers its Divorcing Parents Seminar in order to help parties involved in a divorce with minor children met their mandatory parenting time seminar at the Cobb County Superior Court Building (Building D; 6th floor jury assembly room), 30 Waddle Street, Marietta, GA 30090.

Cobb County (like Gwinnett) also offer both a four hour weekday seminar (from 8:30 am to 1:00 p.m.) or two two-hour evening sessions (from 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.). The cost of the seminar is currently $30.00 per person. You can find additional information and register online for these seminars at the Cobb County Divorcing Parents Seminar website.

DeKalb County (Avondale Estates, Chamblee, Decatur, Doraville, Lithonia, and Stone Mountain) offers its Seminar for Divorcing Parents at three different locations:

• The Callaway Building located at 120 West Trinity Place Room 311, Decatur, Georgia
• DeKalb County Courthouse Judicial Tower located at 556 N. McDonough St, 5th Floor Room “A”, Decatur, Georgia
• The Maloof Building located at 1300 Commerce Drive Decatur, Decatur, Georgia, in the Annex building

The seminars are held on:

• the first Wednesday of each month from 12:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
• the third Wednesday of each month from 9:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. and
• the fourth Friday of each month from 9:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m.

The cost of the seminar is currently $30.00 per person. Dates and time are subject to change so please check the DeKalb County Seminar for Divorcing Parents website for the most up to date information and for online registration under the divorce tab.